AeroNOVA Sentient Twin — operational intelligence workspace
New: Airport Manager 2026 - mixed traffic, both runways & terminal plans
ONE SCHEDULE · ONE CLOCK · ONE EVENT STREAM
Every turnaround.
Connected.
Departure-driven simulation with assumed inbound rotations and resource reservations.
PLANNING SIMULATION
Partial 10 October 2026 departure snapshot · no live feed
Partial 10 October 2026 departure snapshot · no live feed
Provisional Code C stand eligibility • North runway only • Bidirectional mapped taxi paths • Synthetic inbound rotations • Timed taxi-edge reservations. These results do not establish airport capacity or operational clearance.
Preparing mapped routes and stand register…
00:00
Runways: 09L/27R 4,000 × 45 m; 09R/27L 4,000 × 60 m (OSM tags). Markings, lighting, PAPI/LOC and windsocks are illustrative, not surveyed or validated against current AIP. Both runways are displayed; simulated movements use the north runway.
HOS = Head of Stand Road; TOS = Tail of Stand Road. Labelled road overlays and terminal detailing are inferred concepts, not surveyed installations. Parking reference and nose-gear stop share the painted guidance geometry. Landside: mapped road alignments and hotel footprints; estimated upper forecourt and basement levels. Metro and MLCP are schematic. Amber future-terminal extent comes from OSM; approved reservation boundaries are unavailable. Basement X-ray reveals otherwise hidden subgrade structures.
Drag to orbit · wheel to zoom · Aircraft colour: mint baseline / amber selected. Buildings are estimated volumes; © OpenStreetMap contributors. ODbL.
Shared flight board
STD is from the selected demand source; all arrival times, stands, rotations and departure outcomes below are modelled. Select a row to inspect its events.
| Flight / destination | STD IST | Stand | Current state | Modelled departure | Delay / baseline difference |
|---|
Stand register & boundaries
Mapped positions are retained. Stand aircraft compatibility and terminal allocations need airport validation. Unreachable stands and inferred connectors over 100 m are excluded. Crossings without shared graph nodes, wingspan clearance, real runway rules and south-runway operations remain unvalidated.
The deterministic planner processes rotations in assumed-arrival order and books their full turnarounds. It is conservative and not an optimised dispatcher. Eight teams per service and four tugs are scenario assumptions. Baseline delays may be large; they indicate this model’s constraints, not measured BLR performance.